← Episode archive

Classic Frasier · Season 11 · Episode 19

Miss Right Now

IN THE ROOM

RyanBrad(ley)Curtis

NO COMMON DENOMINATOR

Episode ratings.

Brad(ley)B+Letter grade
CurtisBest rewatched episode so farLoved it; Jennifer Tilly carries much of it
Ryan9.5/10Numeric episode rating

Original rating systems, exactly as represented in the archive. These scales are not interchangeable.

By way of introduction.

Curtis

Host of the backwards Frasier rewatch.

Ryan

Resident upside downer; excited not to miss this one right now.

Brad(ley)

Visitor, fresh from New Jersey; full greeting and city banter below.

Read the full performed opening

Welcome to Reverse Psychology, the Frasier Rewatch podcast where we go backwards through every episode of the show. Tonight, we are covering season 11, episode 19, Miss Right Now. Is this the episode where Frasier Netflix and chills? We'll find out. I'm your host, Curtis Sheck. Joining me as always, our resident upside downer, it's Ryan Sansone. I'm excited not to miss this one right now, Curtis. Curtis. Okay. And also with us today, our visitor, Bradley Gersten. What up, what up? I just came back from the beautiful, sexiest city in America, better known as New Jersey, so I am ready to be great again. Yes, the sexy city of New Jersey. One of my favorite cities. Yeah, none of that's great, but exactly how I expected it to go, but I'll take credit for it. It took twists and turns. Yeah, it was great. Oh my gosh, this is off to a rousing start.

Someone brought rules.

The games, the premises, and what everyone brought to the table.

How this one works

Setup and instructions
  1. So, Ryan, was Daddy in this episode?
Context and recorded outcome
  1. Title: Deddy do or Deddy Don’t Activity request: So, Ryan, was Daddy in this episode? Notable references: Eddie Result qualification: We were going to gaslight you into thinking there was no Daddy.

RESULT STATUS

The recorded result is unresolved.

No explicit participant winner or final tie is established in the reviewed record.

What was recorded

What everyone brought to the table · 2 recorded contributions

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

dog answer

I saw the dog. Answer qualification: I've definitely never seen that dog before. I'm 100% sure I've never seen him before this episode. Response status: completed with later reaffirmation

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Ryan

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

Attribution unavailable

dog wrap

Adjudication: I knew you would see the dog. Notable events: We were going to gaslight you into thinking there was no Daddy. But you ruined it by not volunteering that you saw him and ruined my plan. Hey, I said, like I described the scene and it purposely did not mention Eddie. Activity request: Read us and text us screenshots or whatever to Curtis's email. Pictures of dog.

Preserved source round labels (1)

These overlapping source containers are not additional rounds or participant answers. Their recorded labels and excerpt links remain available here; their shared exchanges appear above.

Follow the round structure (1)

Was he in this episode?

Prompt: Was he in this episode?

RECORDED EXCHANGE

Participant cited: Ryan

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

So, Ryan, was Daddy in this episode?
Question / challenge

Prompt: So, Ryan, was Daddy in this episode?

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Ryan
Round context
  • Respondent: Ryan
View source wording — how it was explained on the show
  • Respondent: Ryan
  • Facilitator: Curtis

Game / activity

Fast Food Frasier ↗

How this one works

Setup and instructions
  1. So I want to know from you two, what fast food restaurant or item do you think would win him over?
  2. We all know that in this episode, Niles has fallen head over heels for greasy burgers and chimichangas. But Frasier remains unconvinced.
  3. I think you can pick an item or you could pick an entire restaurant. You can still use it. What matters is will he be willing to not only eat it, but like admit after eating it that it's good.
Context and recorded outcome
  1. Title: Fast Food Frasier Activity premise: We all know that in this episode, Niles has fallen head over heels for greasy burgers and chimichangas. But Frasier remains unconvinced. Activity request: So I want to know from you two, what fast food restaurant or item do you think would win him over? Rules: I think you can pick an item or you could pick an entire restaurant. You can still use it. What matters is will he be willing to not only eat it, but like admit after eating it that it's good. Brad: Wendy’s Frosty. Ryan: Taco Bell breakfast. Curtis: Panera. The record confirms Panera eligibility remains disputed after the objections and assertion that it counts; no winner is inferred.

RESULT STATUS

The recorded result is unresolved.

No explicit participant winner or final tie is established in the reviewed record.

What was recorded

What everyone brought to the table · 1 recorded contribution

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

Attribution unavailable

food aside

So I can answer this question or we can just make fun of Curtis.

Preserved source round labels (1)

These overlapping source containers are not additional rounds or participant answers. Their recorded labels and excerpt links remain available here; their shared exchanges appear above.

Follow the round structure (1)

food round

Activity request: what fast food restaurant or item do you think would win him over? Status: closed with disputed final eligibility

RECORDED EXCHANGE

Participant cited: Attribution unavailable

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

So I want to know from you two, what fast food restaurant or item do you think would win him over?
Question / challenge

Prompt: So I want to know from you two, what fast food restaurant or item do you think would win him over? Rules: I think you can pick an item or you could pick an entire restaurant. It's not a matter of whether it tastes good. What matters is will he be willing to not only eat it, but like admit after eating it that it's good.

More of this contribution
  • Respondents: Brad Ryan

WHAT THEY BROUGHT

food brad

Choice: Wendy's Frosty Answer qualification: I don't love my answer because I don't really think there's a correct answer because I think the answer is really zero. The reason why I went with a Frosty is because I wanted to go with something that wasn't like so typical fast food because I don't think you're ever going to be able to win him over, my personal opinion, with like a true fast food.

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Brad

WHAT THEY BROUGHT

food taco

Choice: Taco Bell California Crunchwrap Answer qualification: Send it to him for breakfast. I don't know if this existed in 2004. Can I still use it? There's both guacamole and a hash brown in the Crunchwrap.

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Ryan

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

food date

Answer qualification: Closer to 10 years, but definitely not 2004. Rules: You can still use it. Final phrase attribution: Who says “Closer to 10 years, but definitely not 2004”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Curtis

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Curtis

RECORDED EXCHANGE

Participant cited: Attribution unavailable

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

Wait, when did they start doing breakfast? Craig, can you look that up for us?
Question / challenge

Prompt: Wait, when did they start doing breakfast? Craig, can you look that up for us? Response context: Ryan invents Craig as a fictional producer; no actual participant Craig is established.

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Craig

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

food lookup answer

2014.

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Curtis

RECORDED EXCHANGE

Participant cited: Attribution unavailable

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

Can I still use it?
Question / challenge

Question: Can I still use it?

WHAT THEY BROUGHT

food panera

Choice: Panera bread. Answer qualification: much more in the lane of what Frazier would say yes to.

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Curtis

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

Attribution unavailable
food frosty feedback

Adjudication: I feel like a Frosty is a weird choice. I'm not sure that's going to appeal to any of his sensibilities. I don't I don't agree with that call either. Final phrase attribution: Who says “a Frosty is a weird choice”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Curtis; Who says “not sure that’s going to appeal”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Curtis; Who says “I don’t agree with that call either”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Ryan

More of this contribution
  • Adjudicator: Who says “a Frosty is a weird choice”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Curtis; Who says “not sure that’s going to appeal”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Curtis; Who says “I don’t agree with that call either”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Ryan

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

food taco feedback

Adjudication: You can still use it. But I don't know why you would, because it's a terrible answer. So I completely, I think you're going way too low. Adjudication method: What matters is will he be willing to not only eat it, but like admit after eating it that it's good. Final phrase attribution: Who says “You can still use it”? The food proposers are already…

Read the full archive excerpt

Adjudication: You can still use it. But I don't know why you would, because it's a terrible answer. So I completely, I think you're going way too low. Adjudication method: What matters is will he be willing to not only eat it, but like admit after eating it that it's good. Final phrase attribution: Who says “You can still use it”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Curtis; Who says “it’s a terrible answer”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Curtis; Who says “you’re going way too low”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Curtis

More of this contribution
  • Adjudicator: Curtis

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

Attribution unavailable
food panera feedback

Adjudication: That's not fast food. I agree that it matches his taste palate. Vito. Try again. We all agree it counts. Adjudication verdict: disputed no ratified eligibility Final phrase attribution: Who says “That’s not fast food”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Ryan; Who says “I agree that it matches his taste palate”? The food proposers are…

Read the full archive excerpt

Adjudication: That's not fast food. I agree that it matches his taste palate. Vito. Try again. We all agree it counts. Adjudication verdict: disputed no ratified eligibility Final phrase attribution: Who says “That’s not fast food”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Ryan; Who says “I agree that it matches his taste palate”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Ryan; Who says “Veto / Vito”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Ryan; Who says “Try again”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Ryan; Who says “We all agree it counts”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Curtis; After the objections and “We all agree it counts,” is Panera’s eligibility actually agreed, still disputed, or not determinable? This asks about eligibility, not a host winner.: Still disputed

More of this contribution
  • Adjudicator: Who says “That’s not fast food”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Ryan; Who says “I agree that it matches his taste palate”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Ryan; Who says “Veto / Vito”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Ryan; Who says “Try again”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Ryan; Who says “We all agree it counts”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Curtis

RECORDED EXCHANGE

Participant cited: Attribution unavailable

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

Try again.
Question / challenge

Prompt: Try again.

View source wording — how it was explained on the show
  • Facilitator: Curtis
  • Participants: Curtis Brad Ryan

Comic bits and episode moments.

Conversation excerpt

Reverse Psychology ↗

Title: Reverse Psychology Activity description: Welcome to Reverse Psychology, the Frasier Rewatch podcast where we go backwards through every episode of the show. Tonight, we are covering season 11, episode 19, Miss Right Now. Is this the episode where Frasier Netflix and chills? We'll find out. I'm your host, Curtis Sheck. Joining me as always, our resident…

Read the full archive excerpt

Title: Reverse Psychology Activity description: Welcome to Reverse Psychology, the Frasier Rewatch podcast where we go backwards through every episode of the show. Tonight, we are covering season 11, episode 19, Miss Right Now. Is this the episode where Frasier Netflix and chills? We'll find out. I'm your host, Curtis Sheck. Joining me as always, our resident upside downer, it's Ryan Sansone. I'm excited not to miss this one right now, Curtis. Curtis. Okay. And also with us today, our visitor, Bradley Gersten. What up, what up? I just came back from the beautiful, sexiest city in America, better known as New Jersey, so I am ready to be great again. Yes, the sexy city of New Jersey. One of my favorite cities. Yeah, none of that's great, but exactly how I expected it to go, but I'll take credit for it. It took twists and turns. Yeah, it was great. Oh my gosh, this is off to a rousing start.

Source details
  • Facilitator: Curtis Sheck
  • Participants: Curtis Sheck Ryan Sansone Bradley Gersten

Prompt: Well, Brad, was this a good episode?

What was recorded

What everyone brought to the table · 1 recorded contribution

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

rating brad

I really liked this episode. Answer qualification: It flowed very well. Scores: B+

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Brad
Source details
  • Respondent: Brad
  • Facilitator: Curtis

Prompt: How about you, Curtis? What did you think of the episode?

What was recorded

What everyone brought to the table · 1 recorded contribution

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

rating curtis

I loved this episode. Answer qualification: I think it mostly rests on Jennifer Tilly's shoulders. Of the ones we've rewatched or watched, I would say this is the best episode so far.

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Curtis
Source details
  • Respondent: Curtis
  • Facilitator: Ryan

Prompt: Ryan, what did you think of it?

What was recorded

What everyone brought to the table · 1 recorded contribution

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

rating ryan

I think easily the best episode. Answer qualification: I think Ronnie was the all-star, though. I give her the MVP. Scores: 9.5 out of 10

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Ryan
Source details
  • Respondent: Ryan
  • Facilitator: Brad

Conversation excerpt

rating wrap ↗

That's a great score. Well done, Frasier TV show.

Conversation excerpt

food callback ↗

Well, I'm just going to talk about a different episode if we're not going to follow prompts.

Conversation excerpt

outro ↗

Well, that will do it for us. Can we go back to that whole thing, re-edit it, and Curtis, you just say,

How this one works

Setup and instructions
  1. camping? Did you like camping? Are you glampers? What's your camping situation?
  2. So in this episode, Charlotte goes camping. It does not go well.
Context and recorded outcome
  1. Prompt: camping? Did you like camping? Are you glampers? What's your camping situation? Activity premise: So in this episode, Charlotte goes camping. It does not go well.

See how they answered

What everyone brought to the table · 4 recorded contributions

3 attributed voices

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

camp first

I'm not a camper. Important beats: I somehow disassembled part of the tent and then just kind of started hitting her with it. literally never had a babysitter ever again. As far as I remember. Answer qualification: I mean, again, like vaguely blocked it out, but I, I think I was seven ish.

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Ryan

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

camp brad

but the point of the story was we went camping. Important beats: either a husband and wife or boyfriend, girlfriend that were fighting The cops like had to catch him like almost They, they caught him successfully. Answer qualification: I mean, I don't think I've ever told you guys this story.

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Brad

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

camp curtis

so my story, uh, growing up, we, we would go camping. Important beats: packed tent poles. They had packed Halloween costumes. Answer qualification: I, I might be conflating this with a separate chip I honestly don't remember how that got resolved.

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Curtis
Show 1 more contribution

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

Attribution unavailable

Okay. But like, give us some context. Like what age were you?

Question: Okay. But like, give us some context. Like what age were you? Sorry. I didn't pick up on the joke. As I've gotten older, I think my Baltimore accent is getting stronger and stronger. We can edit the order. No problem.

Source details
  • Facilitator: Curtis

How this one works

Setup and instructions
  1. Brad, can you do Daphne's burger line?
Context and recorded outcome
  1. Prompt: Brad, can you do Daphne's burger line? Final phrase attribution: Who says “Brad, can you do Daphne’s burger line?”?: Ryan

See how they answered

What everyone brought to the table · 6 recorded contributions

3 attributed voices

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

imitation brad

You mean buggers, buggers, buggers?

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Brad

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

Attribution unavailable

imitation feedback

Adjudication: Way worse than I thought it would be. That was terrible. No, it's worse. Final phrase attribution: Who says “Way worse than I thought it would be”?: Ryan; Who says “That was terrible”?: Curtis; Who says “No, it’s worse”?: Ryan

More of this contribution
  • Participants: Who says “Way worse than I thought it would be”?: Ryan; Who says “That was terrible”?: Curtis; Who says “No, it’s worse”?: Ryan

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

imitation variant question

Action: You're saying when she says she wants to go to burgers, burgers, burgers? Final phrase attribution: Who says “You’re saying when she says she wants to go to burgers, burgers, burgers?”?: Curtis

More of this contribution
  • Participant: Curtis
Show 3 more contributions

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

imitation variant beggar

Action: It's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's more like beggar, beggar, beggar, beggar. Final phrase attribution: Who says “It’s more like beggar…”?: Brad

More of this contribution
  • Participant: Brad

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

imitation variant repeat

Action: Beggar, beggar, beggar, beggar. Final phrase attribution: Who says “Beggar, beggar, beggar, beggar”?: Curtis

More of this contribution
  • Participant: Curtis

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

imitation variant boga

Action: She goes like, she goes like, boga, boga, boga. Final phrase attribution: Who says “She goes like…boga, boga, boga”?: Ryan

More of this contribution
  • Participant: Ryan
Source details
  • Respondent: Brad
  • Participants: Brad Ryan Curtis
  • Facilitator: Ryan

How this one works

Setup and instructions
  1. Guys, we got two actresses who have names that kind of rhyme. What are they, Brad?
Context and recorded outcome
  1. Prompt: Guys, we got two actresses who have names that kind of rhyme. What are they, Brad?

See how they answered

What everyone brought to the table · 4 recorded contributions

2 attributed voices

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

names brad

Laura, Liddy, and Jennifer Tilly.

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Brad

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

Attribution unavailable

names play

It does sound like some sort of weird fairy tale you're trying to tell. Answer qualification: Yeah, it sounded worse.

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

names forward

Action: Laura, Liddy, and Jennifer Tilly went up the hill to the blah, blah, blah. Laura, Liddy, Jennifer Tilly.

More of this contribution
  • Participant: Ryan
Show 1 more contribution

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

names backward

Activity request: How about if I say it backwards? Action: Jennifer Tilly, Laura, and Liddy. Answer qualification: That was harder.

More of this contribution
  • Participant: Brad
Source details
  • Respondent: Brad
  • Facilitator: Ryan

How this one works

Setup and instructions
  1. Ryan, why don't you tell us what to expect next week when we cover the previous episode?
  2. It's season 11, episode 18, Match Game.
Context and recorded outcome
  1. Prompt: Ryan, why don't you tell us what to expect next week when we cover the previous episode? Prompt item: It's season 11, episode 18, Match Game.

What was recorded

What everyone brought to the table · 1 recorded contribution

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

prediction

Surely this must be the time that Frasier meets Charlotte. This must be a plan hatched by Roz to give her something to do. Frasier isn't resistant, but then agrees because, oh, what the heck. Do we meet Ronnie? I don't think so. Ronnie and Martin continue their relationship. Ronnie Raz is Niles, who's flummoxed to find out she's never partaken in a scone. Daphne is around. Submission type: prediction

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Ryan
Source details
  • Respondent: Ryan
  • Facilitator: Curtis

By way of goodbye.

More from this part of the archive.

The whole archive ↗