1 RECORDED APPEARANCE

Fast Food Frasier

Curtis asks which fast-food restaurant or item might win Frasier over.

1game appearance
0explicit participant winners
1results needing restraint
0different recorded winners

Miss Right Now ↗

Listen to the full Miss Right Now episode ↗

Game / activity

Fast Food Frasier

How this one works

Setup and instructions
  1. So I want to know from you two, what fast food restaurant or item do you think would win him over?
  2. We all know that in this episode, Niles has fallen head over heels for greasy burgers and chimichangas. But Frasier remains unconvinced.
  3. I think you can pick an item or you could pick an entire restaurant. You can still use it. What matters is will he be willing to not only eat it, but like admit after eating it that it's good.
Context and recorded outcome
  1. Title: Fast Food Frasier Activity premise: We all know that in this episode, Niles has fallen head over heels for greasy burgers and chimichangas. But Frasier remains unconvinced. Activity request: So I want to know from you two, what fast food restaurant or item do you think would win him over? Rules: I think you can pick an item or you could pick an entire restaurant. You can still use it. What matters is will he be willing to not only eat it, but like admit after eating it that it's good. Brad: Wendy’s Frosty. Ryan: Taco Bell breakfast. Curtis: Panera. The record confirms Panera eligibility remains disputed after the objections and assertion that it counts; no winner is inferred.

RESULT STATUS

The recorded result is unresolved.

No explicit participant winner or final tie is established in the reviewed record.

What was recorded

What everyone brought to the table · 1 recorded contribution

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

Attribution unavailable

food aside

So I can answer this question or we can just make fun of Curtis.

Preserved source round labels (1)

These overlapping source containers are not additional rounds or participant answers. Their recorded labels and excerpt links remain available here; their shared exchanges appear above.

Follow the round structure (1)

food round

Activity request: what fast food restaurant or item do you think would win him over? Status: closed with disputed final eligibility

RECORDED EXCHANGE

Participant cited: Attribution unavailable

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

So I want to know from you two, what fast food restaurant or item do you think would win him over?
Question / challenge

Prompt: So I want to know from you two, what fast food restaurant or item do you think would win him over? Rules: I think you can pick an item or you could pick an entire restaurant. It's not a matter of whether it tastes good. What matters is will he be willing to not only eat it, but like admit after eating it that it's good.

More of this contribution
  • Respondents: Brad Ryan

WHAT THEY BROUGHT

food brad

Choice: Wendy's Frosty Answer qualification: I don't love my answer because I don't really think there's a correct answer because I think the answer is really zero. The reason why I went with a Frosty is because I wanted to go with something that wasn't like so typical fast food because I don't think you're ever going to be able to win him over, my personal opinion, with like a true fast food.

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Brad

WHAT THEY BROUGHT

food taco

Choice: Taco Bell California Crunchwrap Answer qualification: Send it to him for breakfast. I don't know if this existed in 2004. Can I still use it? There's both guacamole and a hash brown in the Crunchwrap.

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Ryan

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

food date

Answer qualification: Closer to 10 years, but definitely not 2004. Rules: You can still use it. Final phrase attribution: Who says “Closer to 10 years, but definitely not 2004”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Curtis

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Curtis

RECORDED EXCHANGE

Participant cited: Attribution unavailable

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

Wait, when did they start doing breakfast? Craig, can you look that up for us?
Question / challenge

Prompt: Wait, when did they start doing breakfast? Craig, can you look that up for us? Response context: Ryan invents Craig as a fictional producer; no actual participant Craig is established.

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Craig

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

food lookup answer

2014.

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Curtis

RECORDED EXCHANGE

Participant cited: Attribution unavailable

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

Can I still use it?
Question / challenge

Question: Can I still use it?

WHAT THEY BROUGHT

food panera

Choice: Panera bread. Answer qualification: much more in the lane of what Frazier would say yes to.

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Curtis

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

Attribution unavailable
food frosty feedback

Adjudication: I feel like a Frosty is a weird choice. I'm not sure that's going to appeal to any of his sensibilities. I don't I don't agree with that call either. Final phrase attribution: Who says “a Frosty is a weird choice”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Curtis; Who says “not sure that’s going to appeal”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Curtis; Who says “I don’t agree with that call either”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Ryan

More of this contribution
  • Adjudicator: Who says “a Frosty is a weird choice”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Curtis; Who says “not sure that’s going to appeal”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Curtis; Who says “I don’t agree with that call either”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Ryan

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

food taco feedback

Adjudication: You can still use it. But I don't know why you would, because it's a terrible answer. So I completely, I think you're going way too low. Adjudication method: What matters is will he be willing to not only eat it, but like admit after eating it that it's good. Final phrase attribution: Who says “You can still use it”? The food proposers are already…

Read the full archive excerpt

Adjudication: You can still use it. But I don't know why you would, because it's a terrible answer. So I completely, I think you're going way too low. Adjudication method: What matters is will he be willing to not only eat it, but like admit after eating it that it's good. Final phrase attribution: Who says “You can still use it”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Curtis; Who says “it’s a terrible answer”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Curtis; Who says “you’re going way too low”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Curtis

More of this contribution
  • Adjudicator: Curtis

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

Attribution unavailable
food panera feedback

Adjudication: That's not fast food. I agree that it matches his taste palate. Vito. Try again. We all agree it counts. Adjudication verdict: disputed no ratified eligibility Final phrase attribution: Who says “That’s not fast food”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Ryan; Who says “I agree that it matches his taste palate”? The food proposers are…

Read the full archive excerpt

Adjudication: That's not fast food. I agree that it matches his taste palate. Vito. Try again. We all agree it counts. Adjudication verdict: disputed no ratified eligibility Final phrase attribution: Who says “That’s not fast food”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Ryan; Who says “I agree that it matches his taste palate”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Ryan; Who says “Veto / Vito”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Ryan; Who says “Try again”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Ryan; Who says “We all agree it counts”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Curtis; After the objections and “We all agree it counts,” is Panera’s eligibility actually agreed, still disputed, or not determinable? This asks about eligibility, not a host winner.: Still disputed

More of this contribution
  • Adjudicator: Who says “That’s not fast food”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Ryan; Who says “I agree that it matches his taste palate”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Ryan; Who says “Veto / Vito”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Ryan; Who says “Try again”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Ryan; Who says “We all agree it counts”? The food proposers are already confirmed.: Curtis

RECORDED EXCHANGE

Participant cited: Attribution unavailable

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

Try again.
Question / challenge

Prompt: Try again.

View source wording — how it was explained on the show
  • Facilitator: Curtis
  • Participants: Curtis Brad Ryan