← Episode archive

Classic Frasier · Season 11 · Episode 17

Coots and Ladders

IN THE ROOM

RyanBrad(ley)Curtis

NO COMMON DENOMINATOR

Episode ratings.

Brad(ley)B−Overall episode grade
Brad(ley)B+Choreography grade, separate from episode grade
Curtis#8 of 8Ordinal rewatch ranking; least liked so far
Ryan8.3/10Original episode-time rating · Ryan’s default /10
Rating context
  • Original rating: 8.3. Revised to 8.1 in Boo.

Original rating systems, exactly as represented in the archive. These scales are not interchangeable.

More than one rating is recorded for the same person here. Both entries are preserved; we haven’t inferred a single final verdict.

By way of introduction.

Curtis

Host, introducing the mystery guest.

Ryan

Resident upside downer: “Coot, coot, ca-choo to you, Curtis.”

Brad(ley)

Mystery guest; good looking, single and ready to mingle, with third-person banter.

Read the full performed opening

Welcome to Reverse Psychology, the Frasier Rewatch podcast where we go backwards through every episode of the show. Tonight, we are covering Season 11, Episode 17, Hoots and Ladders. Is this the time Frasier plays Clue while everyone else is playing Snakes and Ladders? We'll find out. I'm your host, Curtis Schack. Joining me as always, it's our resident upside downer. It's Ryan Sansone. Cout, coot, ca-choo to you, Curtis. Also with us today, our mystery guest. Ooh, I wonder who it is. Whoever it is, I'm sure he's very good looking, very single, and very ready to mingle. Well, he speaks in the third person, so we don't like him. He just knows how to be suave and stylish. Does he? He sometimes needs to be reminded just to stop talking, but yes.

Someone brought rules.

The games, the premises, and what everyone brought to the table.

How this one works

Setup and instructions
  1. name the lady and the crime
  2. propose to pitch fake crimes
  3. fictional ladies but I will accept at least one of those two answers. It could be book. It could be an artwork. It could be your imagination.
Context and recorded outcome
  1. Activity premise: propose to pitch fake crimes Activity request: name the lady and the crime Rules: fictional ladies but I will accept at least one of those two answers. It could be book. It could be an artwork. It could be your imagination.

RESULT STATUS

The recorded result is unresolved.

No explicit participant winner or final tie is established in the reviewed record.

What was recorded

What everyone brought to the table · 1 recorded contribution

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

Attribution unavailable

crime wrap

Ending or payoff: Well, I guess we should talk about this episode then. I regret nothing.

Preserved source round labels (1)

These overlapping source containers are not additional rounds or participant answers. Their recorded labels and excerpt links remain available here; their shared exchanges appear above.

Follow the round structure (1)

crime round

Interaction mode: name the lady and the crime Answer qualification: but I will accept at least one of those two answers.

RECORDED EXCHANGE

Participant cited: Brad(ley)

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

is there any old ladies that you guys would like to commit a crime against, specifically
Question / challenge

Prompt: is there any old ladies that you guys would like to commit a crime against, specifically Prompt item: fictional ladies Activity request: name the lady and the crime Rules: but I will accept at least one of those two answers.

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Brad

WHAT THEY BROUGHT

crime guest submission

Choice: Cruella de Vil Action: put her in a tank and have piranhas eat her. Answer qualification: I'm not a hundred percent sure if she is an old lady because she did terrible things to dogs. like evil dogs in the water, so why not? Response context: It can be TV show, movie, anything, right? But I, so I have to say the crime I would do?

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Brad

RECORDED EXCHANGE

Participant cited: Curtis

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

Well, how about you, Curtis? What old lady would you like to commit a crime
Question / challenge

Prompt: Well, how about you, Curtis? What old lady would you like to commit a crime

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Curtis

WHAT THEY BROUGHT

crime curtis submission

Choice: Lucille Bluth from Arrested Development Action: a crime of passion status: SUPERSEDED; action: a crime of passion Response status: REVISED Answer qualification: I'm going to change my answer to Lucille Bluth from Arrested Development. Oh, you ruined my punchline. Response context: Yeah, I mean, I know you gave us this question ahead of time, but I did not understand it and did not prepare for it, even if I did understand it. So... Because, because... Phrase attribution: that’s my bad: Curtis

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Curtis

RECORDED EXCHANGE

Participant cited: Ryan

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

I want to hear your kind of... what the correct answer was, let's say.
Question / challenge

Prompt: I want to hear your kind of... what the correct answer was, let's say. Final phrase attribution: Who asks Ryan for “what the correct answer was”? Curtis’s “That’s my bad” is already confirmed.: Curtis

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Ryan
  • Facilitator: Curtis

WHAT THEY BROUGHT

crime ryan submission

Choice: Abuela Response context: Encanto Action: I'd like to kidnap her and drop her off... I want to drop her off into the middle of a town, nowhere near anyone she knows, so that she can recognize just how worthless she is. Answer qualification: I don't want her to be, like, in danger. I just want her to understand that she relies on her family too much, and she's way too hard on Mirabelle. Abuela sucks.

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Ryan
View source wording — how it was explained on the show
  • Facilitator: Ryan
  • Respondents: Brad Curtis Ryan

How this one works

Setup and instructions
  1. In this episode that you just watched, did he do or did he don't?
  2. I want to test your psychic abilities.
Context and recorded outcome
  1. Activity premise: I want to test your psychic abilities. Activity request: In this episode that you just watched, did he do or did he don't? Prompt term: Eddie Adjudication: as far as I could tell, you are correct. Title: Deddy do or Deddy don’t

RESULT STATUS

The recorded result is unresolved.

No explicit participant winner or final tie is established in the reviewed record.

What was recorded

What everyone brought to the table · 1 recorded contribution

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

Attribution unavailable

eddie wrap

Response context: And is that because he's not actually part of the show? So clearly he was a figment of Frazier's imagination one time.

Preserved source round labels (1)

These overlapping source containers are not additional rounds or participant answers. Their recorded labels and excerpt links remain available here; their shared exchanges appear above.

Follow the round structure (1)

eddie round

RECORDED EXCHANGE

Participant cited: Ryan

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

In this episode that you just watched, did he do or did he don't?
Question / challenge

Prompt: In this episode that you just watched, did he do or did he don't? Prompt term: Eddie

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Ryan

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

eddie answer

daddy don't Answer qualification: I think he's been in exactly one episode. I am decently, I'm somewhat, I'm a tiny bit confident that daddy don't. Yes, Regis, final answer. Response context: I've really fallen into a false sense of security here. We didn't check in last time, right? Adjudication verdict: correct Result qualification: as far as I could tell

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Ryan

RECORDED EXCHANGE

Participant cited: Attribution unavailable

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

Was that your final answer?
Question / challenge

Question: Was that your final answer?

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

eddie result

Adjudication verdict: correct Correct answer: I did not see Eddie in this episode. Result qualification: as far as I could tell Final phrase attribution: Who says “as far as I could tell, you are correct” in Deddy do or Deddy don’t? The questioner and title are already confirmed.: Curtis

More of this contribution
  • Adjudicator: Curtis
View source wording — how it was explained on the show
  • Respondent: Ryan
  • Facilitator: Curtis

How this one works

Setup and instructions
  1. let us know what we can expect next week when we cover the previous episode
  2. season: 11; episode: 16; title: Boo
Context and recorded outcome
  1. Activity request: let us know what we can expect next week when we cover the previous episode Prompt item: season: 11; episode: 16; title: Boo Result qualification: we can't address in the moment whether it's accurate or not.

RESULT STATUS

The recorded result is unresolved.

No explicit participant winner or final tie is established in the reviewed record.

Preserved source round labels (1)

These overlapping source containers are not additional rounds or participant answers. Their recorded labels and excerpt links remain available here; their shared exchanges appear above.

Follow the round structure (1)

forecast round

RECORDED EXCHANGE

Participant cited: Ryan

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

Why don't you let us know what we can expect next week when we cover the previous episode,
Question / challenge

Prompt: Why don't you let us know what we can expect next week when we cover the previous episode, Prompt item: season 11, episode 16. Boo!

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Ryan

WHAT THEY BROUGHT

forecast submission

Submission type: Prediction for Boo. Response context: Uh, happy to. It's Halloween in Seattle. Niles has decided that this is the year he is putting his foot down. No more Halloween. Frazier, bored with absolutely no social life, sets out to convince Niles that spirits are real. Martin and Ronnie enjoy some spirits of their own, dressed for the occasion before…

Read the full archive excerpt

Submission type: Prediction for Boo. Response context: Uh, happy to. It's Halloween in Seattle. Niles has decided that this is the year he is putting his foot down. No more Halloween. Frazier, bored with absolutely no social life, sets out to convince Niles that spirits are real. Martin and Ronnie enjoy some spirits of their own, dressed for the occasion before running into Frazier. When Ronnie is in the powder room, Martin tries to convince Frazier to put on his costume to dupe his fiancé. Roz takes Daphne shopping, I guess. Phrase attribution: happy, addressed to Curtis; prediction: Ryan

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Ryan
View source wording — how it was explained on the show
  • Respondent: Ryan
  • Facilitator: Curtis

Comic bits and episode moments.

Conversation excerpt

intro ↗

Activity description: Welcome to Reverse Psychology, the Frasier Rewatch podcast where we go backwards through every episode of the show. Tonight, we are covering Season 11, Episode 17, Hoots and Ladders. Is this the time Frasier plays Clue while everyone else is playing Snakes and Ladders? We'll find out. I'm your host, Curtis Schack. Joining me as always, it's…

Read the full archive excerpt

Activity description: Welcome to Reverse Psychology, the Frasier Rewatch podcast where we go backwards through every episode of the show. Tonight, we are covering Season 11, Episode 17, Hoots and Ladders. Is this the time Frasier plays Clue while everyone else is playing Snakes and Ladders? We'll find out. I'm your host, Curtis Schack. Joining me as always, it's our resident upside downer. It's Ryan Sansone. Cout, coot, ca-choo to you, Curtis. Also with us today, our mystery guest. Ooh, I wonder who it is. Whoever it is, I'm sure he's very good looking, very single, and very ready to mingle. Well, he speaks in the third person, so we don't like him. He just knows how to be suave and stylish. Does he? He sometimes needs to be reminded just to stop talking, but yes. Identity clarification: Curtis introduces the mystery guest. The record confirms that guest is Brad, despite no explicit name in this passage; subsequent banter mocks Brad speaking in the third person.

Source details
  • Participants: Curtis Schack Ryan Sansone mystery guest

Question: Did they say what sport she won the Olympic gold bronze? I keep saying running. So it must be running. I don't, I don't recall. Result qualification: I don't, I don't recall. Response context: And none of us chose to commit a crime against her.

Conversation excerpt

ratings ↗

Activity request: was this a good episode? Method: Three different perspectives, three different rating systems. Handoffs: to Brad: Curtis; challenge to Brad: Ryan; to Curtis: Ryan; to Ryan: Brad

See how they answered

What everyone brought to the table · 10 recorded exchanges

3 attributed voices

RECORDED EXCHANGE

Participant cited: Brad(ley)

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

Brad, was this a good episode?

Question / challenge

Prompt: Brad, was this a good episode?

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Brad

RECORDED EXCHANGE

Participant cited: Brad(ley)

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

So you give ratings based on the, how impactful it is to the overall storyline. You're not going for just the funny.

Question / challenge

Prompt: So you give ratings based on the, how impactful it is to the overall storyline. You're not going for just the funny.

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Brad
  • Facilitator: Ryan

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

rating brad answer

I thought it was mid level episode. Like the storylines were kind of dumb. I thought it was actually one of the funniest ones we've seen so far. Scores: B minus Method: I take everything into consideration. Acting. Choreography. the type of, the, the type of coffee

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Brad
Show 7 more contributions

RECORDED EXCHANGE

Participant cited: Brad(ley)

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

But what specifically would you give the choreography?

Question / challenge

Prompt: But what specifically would you give the choreography?

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Brad

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

rating choreography answer

B plus. Scores: subject: the choreography in this episode; rating: B plus Phrase attribution: rating question and choreography echo: Curtis; immediate challenge: Ryan; good question; thank you: Brad

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Brad

RECORDED EXCHANGE

Participant cited: Curtis

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

Curtis, Curtis, it's your turn.

Question / challenge

Prompt: Curtis, Curtis, it's your turn.

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Curtis

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

rating curtis answer

I did not love this one. a lot of the jokes require, I think, really shaky story and character beats. I actually ranked this eight out of eight. Scores: rank: 8; comparisonSetSize: 8; interpretation: liked the least Result qualification: This is the one I think I liked the least.

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Curtis

RECORDED EXCHANGE

Participant cited: Ryan

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

What did you think?

Question / challenge

Prompt: What did you think?

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Ryan

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

rating ryan answer

Scores: currentEpisode: 8.3; previousEpisodeRevised: 8.1; previousEpisodeOriginal: 8.3 Answer qualification: I'm going to try hard not to give it a bump because Charlotte's not involved. It helps that we, we recognize the real main characters, which I think is the brother relationship.

More of this contribution
  • Respondent: Ryan

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

Attribution unavailable

ratings wrap

Method: Three different perspectives, three different rating systems. Response context: you're reducing the previous episode to an 8.1.

Source details
  • Respondents: Brad Curtis Ryan

Conversation excerpt

forecast feedback ↗

Adjudication: you don't even know how to count backwards in the seasons and recognize that we're nowhere close to Halloween. Result qualification: We haven't even seen a Christmas episode in this season that we're working backwards from. Response context: I don't know when, I don't know when this show starts. Maybe they do it off cycle, I don't know. In Ryan's,…

Read the full archive excerpt

Adjudication: you don't even know how to count backwards in the seasons and recognize that we're nowhere close to Halloween. Result qualification: We haven't even seen a Christmas episode in this season that we're working backwards from. Response context: I don't know when, I don't know when this show starts. Maybe they do it off cycle, I don't know. In Ryan's, in Ryan's defense, he did ask us if each season had 12 episodes. Scope clarification: Curtis says they are nowhere close to Halloween. This is feedback about the prediction and is not part of Ryan’s prediction itself. Final phrase attribution: Who says “In Ryan’s defense, he did ask us if each season had 12 episodes”? Curtis’s Halloween criticism and the feedback’s placement are already confirmed.: Brad Resolved phrase speakers: Who says “In Ryan’s defense, he did ask us if each season had 12 episodes”? Curtis’s Halloween criticism and the feedback’s placement are already confirmed.: Brad

Conversation excerpt

retrospective ↗

Activity description: take a look at how accurate your projections were. Result qualification: I'm not going to mention the things where you missed Phrase attribution: asks evaluations: Curtis; shooed that lady: Ryan; Niles and Daphne married: Curtis

0

What was recorded

What everyone brought to the table · 4 recorded contributions

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

recap work

you guessed that Fraser would go to work happened. Adjudication verdict: the things you did get right

More of this contribution
  • Claimant: Ryan

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

recap roz

you guessed that Roz is going to ask him why he came to work. Adjudication: We had a version of that with her doing his job for him. Result qualification: This one's a bit of a stretch

More of this contribution
  • Claimant: Ryan

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

recap vermin

Niles would be ridding an apartment of vermin Adjudication: which didn't quite happen either. He shooed that old lady off of a metal. So that's pretty close. Result qualification: This is another kind of a stretch.

More of this contribution
  • Claimant: Ryan
Show 1 more contribution

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

recap ladder

you said it'd be Daphne there would be someone on a ladder in this episode. Adjudication: person: incorrect; ladderPresence: correctly guess Result qualification: And Niles is married to Daphne. So that's a pretty close call.

More of this contribution
  • Claimant: Ryan
Source details
  • Claimant: Ryan

By way of goodbye.

Curtis

Poached eggs all over my feet, what is a girl to do?

Source excerpt ↗ 49:04–49:10
Original sign-off transcript

So, for myself, Ryan, and Brad, poached eggs all over my feet, what is a girl to do?

More from this part of the archive.

The whole archive ↗