1 RECORDED APPEARANCE

Reasonable proposals, angry mob

Each participant proposes something reasonable while the others play an angry mob.

1game appearance
0explicit participant winners
0results needing restraint
0different recorded winners

Motherload Part 2 ↗

Listen to the full Motherload Part 2 episode ↗

Game / activity

Reasonable proposals, angry mob

Curtis introduces the game: each participant proposes something reasonable while the others act as a dumb, panicky mob. Whoever emerges least scathed is supposed to win. No points are assigned.

Follow the round structure (4)

Frank: vacations are awesome

Frank defends vacations, including staying home and having time off work. The mock opposition calls vacations stupid, objects to taking time off and suggests needing a vacation from a vacation.

This round boundary is recorded; no separately attributable answers are available inside it.

Curtis: every store should have self-checkout

Curtis proposes at least one self-checkout in every store because he values his time. The mob raises job loss, theft and stores where the idea may not work. Asked whether he is pro-theft, Curtis jokingly says yes. A Target-employment tangent interrupts the discussion; it is not an additional proposal. Ryan eventually says, “You’ve won me over.”

This round boundary is recorded; no separately attributable answers are available inside it.

Ryan: no device audio without headphones

Ryan wants mobile-device audio banned without headphones. The mock opposition brings up fascism, boomboxes, swimming pools and parenting. He briefly permits a backyard exception, then withdraws it after pushback and reaffirms that devices should be quiet. During the parenting discussion, Frank says the questioner is not wrong to be annoyed by a parent allowing audible device sound. Interleaved rationales remain unattributed.

This round boundary is recorded; no separately attributable answers are available inside it.

Brad: cash discounts everywhere

Brad proposes that every place offer a cash discount, later specifying three percent. His reasons include credit-card information theft, paper money and casino use. The others object to subsidizing cash users and challenge the reasoning. This proposal draws genuine disagreement, unlike the earlier mock opposition.

This round boundary is recorded; no separately attributable answers are available inside it.

The segment is recorded; individual answers are not available in this archive entry.