1 PRESERVED EPISODE MOMENT

Discussion of watching in reverse

Follow the recorded conversation and comic moments. Ordinary ratings, discussion and answers within activities do not establish another game or recurring bit.

1additional game or recurring bit appearances

Goodnight, Seattle: Part 2 ↗

Conversation excerpt

Discussion of watching in reverse

Source excerpt ↗ 45:14–57:59

I'm glad you're saying that because it's a horror. As far as I can tell, the worst decision you can possibly do. Well, even better, like we're going to do this in reverse. So I feel like even once he, once he understands what that was about, I feel like he's not invested in any of the characters related to it yet. So he won't really care. And by the time we get…

Read the full archive excerpt

I'm glad you're saying that because it's a horror. As far as I can tell, the worst decision you can possibly do. Well, even better, like we're going to do this in reverse. So I feel like even once he, once he understands what that was about, I feel like he's not invested in any of the characters related to it yet. So he won't really care. And by the time we get to the intro to that storyline, he's going to be like, well, I don't like these people. Cause the whole thing starts one way. And so like, instead of building to this moment, it's literally like this moment doesn't make any sense. And we're just going to get further from it. Was this podcast a mad idea? I think it's a great idea. No, I think that's what makes this podcast a drill. I was trying to articulate the thesis for why this isn't the best podcast ever come up with. You said it, Curtis. This episode was originally aired with the part one in one episode. Yeah. So we're not doing it that way, which makes it even more bizarre. I'm excited by that. But again, like if, if this, like I thought to myself, because I knew it was aired in one episode.

0

See how they answered

What everyone brought to the table · 2 recorded exchanges

2 attributed voices

RECORDED EXCHANGE

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

Ethan, do you want to watch it backwards?

Question / challenge

No. You're going to spin up a new podcast. I don't care what your brother just said. Let's do it. By Step by. See, I even go ahead and tell us what your thoughts on the episode were.

RECORDED EXCHANGE

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

Brad(ley), Brad(ley), Brad(ley), Brad(ley), how do you think that's pronounced?

Question / challenge

Uh, Quora. Quora. Oh. Well, this self-employed building designer has 5.4 thousand answers on Quora, so you know he knew what he was talking about. I love how he called it Judy Harris.

RECORDED ANSWER / CHOICE

Attribution unavailableSource excerpt ↗ 44:58–57:59

Structured turns

RECORDED EXCHANGE

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

So we're not doing it that way, which makes it even more bizarre.

I'm excited by that.

RECORDED EXCHANGE

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

Ethan, do you want to watch it backwards?

No.

RECORDED EXCHANGE

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

See, I even go ahead and tell us what your thoughts on the episode were.

Um, it's one that I am a big, big fan of TV finales.

RECORDED EXCHANGE

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

Brad(ley), Brad(ley), Brad(ley), Brad(ley), how do you think that's pronounced?

Uh, Quora.

Source details
  • I'm glad you're saying that because it's a horror. As far as I can tell, the worst decision you can possibly do. Well, even better, like we're going to do this in reverse. So I feel like even once he, once he understands what that was about, I feel like he's not invested in any of the characters related to it yet. So he won't really care. And by the time we get to the intro to that storyline, he's going to be like, well, I don't like these people. Cause the whole thing starts one way. And so like, instead of building to this moment, it's literally like this moment doesn't make any sense. And we're just going to get further from it. Was this podcast a mad idea? I think it's a great idea. No, I think that's what makes this podcast a drill. I was trying to articulate the thesis for why this isn't the best podcast ever come up with. You said it, Curtis. This episode was originally aired with the part one in one episode. Yeah. So we're not doing it that way, which makes it even more bizarre. I'm excited by that. But again, like if, if this, like I thought to myself, because I knew it was aired in one episode.
  • Participants take part in a structured discussion tied to the episode.
  • And Just Shoot Me Lady will be very casual the entire time because we have to debut her new
  • Yeah, I'm just going to have to reference some smart stuff that I don't know about because
  • So I might have to study up on my Quora.