← Episode archive

Frasier reboot · Season 1 · Episode 6

Blind Date

IN THE ROOM

RyanBrad(ley)Curtis

NO COMMON DENOMINATOR

Episode ratings.

RyanB+Recorded at 50:02Letter grade
Rating context
  • The final grade is B+. The earlier “give it a…” is an unfinished phrase, not an A grade.
Curtis#45 of 53Recorded at 50:16Ordinal ranking
Brad(ley)#7 of 10 · blindRecorded at 52:19Blind ranking

Original rating systems, exactly as represented in the archive. These scales are not interchangeable.

By way of introduction.

Curtis

your host

Original introduction wording
  • your host
Brad(ley)

resident upside downer

Original introduction wording
  • resident upside downer
Ryan

Introduction recorded; no additional descriptor.

Someone brought rules.

The games, the premises, and what everyone brought to the table.

How this one works

Premise
  1. We'll find out in a cleverly named murder mystery. In this game, each of us are going to introduce a name of a character to the scene. And based on that name alone, we're all going to identify their personality traits and their background. But amongst this crowd is a murderer. And it is going to be up to us to catch the killer. But how many innocent people might be wrongly imprisoned in the process?
How it works
  1. As we reveal the names and the personalities, I'm going to reveal their status. Are they living, or have they been murdered? You're going to make that decision, okay. Do we talk about them? Yeah, you've got to get to know them before you find out if they die. It's dark. I think it's going to be great. Oh my god, this is going to be so tragic. Every time we come across a murdered person, we have to speculate on who the murderer might be. We have to send somebody to prison. Based on our speculation. And there's no coming out. Like, once we find out they weren't the murderer, because more people are dying, it doesn't matter, because we already put them in jail. Is there multiple murderers? There's only one. Is it one of the people we're naming?
  2. So I've set this up so that I have put on a spreadsheet, for each name we're going to plug in, there is a column for whether or not they're murdered and whether or not they're the murderer. And I've made all those cells black with black text, so I can't see. I've rearranged them randomly. So I can't see who's being murdered and who's going to be the murderer. I will reveal it as we go.
  3. All of us. We can, the three of us will vote.
Scoring
  1. I unfortunately think this person is going to get murdered. Oh, interesting. Is that a, well, I don't want to, is that a, well, you, I, you, it doesn't matter whether you guessed that or not. You don't get any points for, for guessing correctly, but I'm going to say that in this case, uh, this guy, I don't think he's a likely suspect.
Recorded outcome
  1. And we caught the murderer. Oh, it only took us 10 attempts. Wow.
Recorded activity context

I mean, she's like the obesity epidemic. Look at Stacey. Let's send her to prison. Let's do it. Yeah, let's do it. Worst case, we're fine. Clean conscience. Sleeping well tonight. 100%. However, she is innocent. Only from this series of murders. Only from this. Well, you're not going to believe how we know. She did. It turns out that before she could even be…

Read the full archive excerpt

I mean, she's like the obesity epidemic. Look at Stacey. Let's send her to prison. Let's do it. Yeah, let's do it. Worst case, we're fine. Clean conscience. Sleeping well tonight. 100%. However, she is innocent. Only from this series of murders. Only from this. Well, you're not going to believe how we know. She did. It turns out that before she could even be arrested, she was found dead in her office. So, yeah. You know what? You know what? No, it's fine. We did the right thing. We did the right thing. And I'm questioning at this point whether or not the murderer is really an evildoer. I think that maybe they're doing something good for the world. Here's the thing.

RESULT STATUS

This one was not a competition.

See how they answered

What everyone brought to the table · 2 recorded exchanges

2 attributed voices

RECORDED EXCHANGE

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

Oh, Ryan Sansone, what about you?

Question / challenge

Who have you got on the bench? I've got Kool-Aid Crane. Kool-Aid Crane. Wow. What a creative name. Brad, I want you to know I spelled Kool-Aid with a C.

RECORDED EXCHANGE

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

So who do we have left, Curtis?

Question / challenge

Uh, we've got Sirius Herman, the animal activist from Jacksonville, a gender non-binary who helps turtles. We have Tom, no, he's sending him to prison. We have Monopoly Fandango, a doorman from a building from the 1950s in Queens.

The rest of the round record

5 primary recorded exchanges · 0 retained source actions. 0 additional round events; 2 overlapping source alternatives. A source action may be a clue, reply, reaction or interruption—not necessarily a participant answer.

RECORDED EXCHANGE

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

I mean, you named the sports player, which is very confusing.

Kool-Aid, I think is he's got the name Crane, which makes him suspicious.

RECORDED EXCHANGE

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

So which one would you, are you more suspicious with?

Yeah.

RECORDED EXCHANGE

“Participant cited” identifies a contributor, not the speaker of every word in this excerpt. It may include other participants’ replies or reactions.

And Brad(ley), why don't you tell us what to expect next week when we can cover the previous episode

at season one, episode five, The Founder Society.

Source alternatives (2)

Matching wording within the same recorded interval supports these overlaps. They are not additional primary exchanges.

Overlapping source representation

Participant referenced: CurtisSource excerpt ↗ 1:18:46

Overlaps the primary exchange; not counted again.

So who do we have left, Curtis? · Uh, we've got Sirius Herman, the animal activist from Jacksonville, a gender non-binary who helps turtles.

View source wording — how it was explained on the show
  • I mean, she's like the obesity epidemic. Look at Stacey. Let's send her to prison. Let's do it. Yeah, let's do it. Worst case, we're fine. Clean conscience. Sleeping well tonight. 100%. However, she is innocent. Only from this series of murders. Only from this. Well, you're not going to believe how we know. She did. It turns out that before she could even be arrested, she was found dead in her office. So, yeah. You know what? You know what? No, it's fine. We did the right thing. We did the right thing. And I'm questioning at this point whether or not the murderer is really an evildoer. I think that maybe they're doing something good for the world. Here's the thing.
  • Participants perform a structured creative or improvisational activity tied to the episode. No competitive scoring or winner is stated.
  • Well, but the good thing is that you must know a lot of drug addicts.
  • And if we get this wrong, we have to go to prison.

Comic bits and episode moments.

By way of goodbye.

Previously, next week.

Predictions as made on the podcast—not claims about what actually happens.

Looking ahead

Next episode predictions

Source excerpt ↗ 1:20:57–1:21:53

at season one

What was recorded

Their next-episode predictions · 11 recorded contributions

Show 8 more predictions

More from this part of the archive.

The whole archive ↗